Evidence and documentation
Evidence should let a reviewer move from a requirement, to an implementation statement, to a current artifact and a knowledgeable owner.
Evidence quality
Section titled “Evidence quality”Prefer artifacts that are:
- Relevant to the exact requirement and assessment objective.
- Current enough to represent how the system operates now.
- Authentic and tied to the system or owner.
- Traceable to the SSP statement and control family.
- Minimized to avoid disclosing unrelated sensitive information.
Typical evidence categories
Section titled “Typical evidence categories”- Approved policies and procedures
- Asset and account inventories
- Network and CUI-flow diagrams
- Configuration exports or screenshots
- Access reviews and authorization records
- Audit logs and monitoring records
- Incident-response exercises
- Training and personnel records
- Backup, recovery, and continuity tests
- Vendor and external-service documentation
Handling rules
Section titled “Handling rules”- Use neutral evidence identifiers instead of local file paths in the SSP.
- Record the owner, collection date, applicable requirement, and storage location.
- Remove unrelated personal data, credentials, tokens, and secrets.
- Preserve original artifacts when their source or history matters.
- Review access before sharing the assessment package.
Keep documents consistent
Section titled “Keep documents consistent”The SSP, diagrams, inventories, policies, and evidence must describe the same environment. Contradictions can cause assessment findings.
Published by Eagle Ridge Advisory. Public guidance only: this site holds no client information, completed security plans, evidence, or legal advice. Current CMMC rules and contract terms control.